Famous Battles and Sieges

The Battle of Crecy

How a smaller English army, with dismounted knights and longbow archers, beat repeated French charges in 1346, and what historians say the victory did and did not prove.

On this page
  1. A campaign before the battle
  2. The English position
  3. What happened
  4. The longbow question
  5. The aftermath
  6. What it meant for the war

A campaign before the battle

In July 1346, King Edward III of England landed on the coast of Normandy with an army that was modest by French standards. His claim to the French throne, and a long list of grievances over Gascony, had led to open war. Rather than try to hold ground, Edward marched through Normandy, burning and plundering, a style of warfare then known as chevauchee raids. Such raids hurt the French king’s reputation, because a king was supposed to protect his people, and they supplied the English army.

Edward moved toward the Seine and then north. Philip VI of France gathered a large force and followed, pushing the English toward the Somme. Edward managed to cross the river at a tidal ford, after which he chose to turn and fight on ground of his own choosing near the village of Crecy in Ponthieu. The date was August 26, 1346.

The English position

Edward placed his army on a slope, with the men largely on foot. Knights and men-at-arms dismounted and formed blocks, and archers stood in wedges or along the flanks. This arrangement, with archers able to shoot across the front of men on the ground, was part of a style the English had been developing in Scottish wars. The young Edward of Woodstock, later called the Black Prince, who was around sixteen, commanded one of the divisions, with experienced captains close at hand. The details of who stood where are reconstructed, and historians disagree about parts of the layout.

What happened

The French army arrived late in the day after a long march. Many of its men were tired, and contemporary accounts describe a disorderly advance as eager nobles pressed forward. Genoese crossbowmen, hired by the French, went first. According to a long-repeated story, rain had slackened their strings and they had left their large shields with the baggage, so they were outshot by the English archers. Modern historians treat these details cautiously, but the general picture is that the crossbowmen failed to break the English line and were driven back, and that French knights behind them rode through or around them.

Then the mounted attacks began. Chroniclers describe a long series of charges up the slope, each broken by arrows and by the English line on the ground. Horses fell, men fell with them, and later waves rode into the confusion. Fighting continued into the night. Among the dead was John of Bohemia, an ally of the French who was blind and who, according to a well-known tradition, had his horse tied to those of his companions so that he could join the charge. Philip VI himself left the field, wounded and unhorsed according to some accounts.

Early gunpowder weapons may have been present on the English side. Some sources mention small cannon, but how effective they were, or whether they mattered at all, remains debated.

The longbow question

Crecy is often presented as the day the longbow ended the age of the knight. That is too simple, for several reasons.

  • The longbow did not defeat armor on its own. Arrows were most dangerous to horses and to men whose armor was thinner, and the French charge was damaged by tired horses, bad ground and lack of coordination.
  • Edward’s army succeeded because it combined archers with a strong defensive position and disciplined men-at-arms. Archers behind a line of dismounted men were harder to attack than archers alone.
  • Knights did not disappear. Later armies still relied on mounted warriors, and plate armor became more elaborate in the decades afterward partly in response to missile weapons.

The deeper lesson is about tactics: a defensive army with good ground could beat a more numerous attacking army that lost its order. English campaigns would use this approach again at Poitiers, a battle that tells a very similar story a decade later, and at Agincourt in 1415. French numbers at Crecy are uncertain in the sources, and the usual claim of a very large French superiority should be read as a rough tradition.

The aftermath

After the victory, Edward did not march on Paris. He moved north and besieged Calais, which fell in 1347 after a long siege. The port gave the English a permanent landing place on the continent, one they held for more than two centuries. The story of the city’s leading citizens offering themselves to the king is a famous legend, and its details are uncertain.

Elsewhere the same year, the Scots, allies of France, were defeated and their king captured at Neville’s Cross, which eased pressure on the northern border. The fighting then paused, partly because the Black Death reached Europe in 1347-48, and partly because both treasuries were strained. In English memory, Edward III’s reign gained a glow from these victories that lasted a long time.

What it meant for the war

Crecy raised English confidence, damaged French prestige, and encouraged the belief that raids and defensive battles could pay. It did not win the French throne. The conflict dragged on through truces and treaties, and later French commanders adapted by avoiding pitched battle and recovering lands through sieges and patient pressure. Seen from this distance, Crecy was a significant early success in the Hundred Years War, but the war was decided over decades, and the victory is better understood as a demonstration than a conclusion.

The complete guide to famous battles and sieges

Medieval Battles and Sieges: What Changed Each Time
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →